CVE-2026-118516 · Package
NO FIX YET · SEE WHAT TO DO
Symfony's two route matchers parse the host and path differently when a route has a host placeholder, so a crafted Host header or hostname can route a request to a protected controller. An anonymous attacker can then reach controllers that access_control or firewall path rules were meant to block.
first public Nov 4, 2026 · 1 source
Is this in your stack? Find out in 2 minutes.
Tell InfraStack what you run. It checks this one, and every next one, against your stack.
Ask from here. InfraStack checks the affected versions against your stack and answers in your inbox.
InfraStack checks the affected versions against your stack and answers in Slack, with the evidence and the fix.
Applications built on Symfony routing that define routes with host placeholders and protect paths with access_control or firewall path rules. Applications without host placeholders, or without path-based authorization, are not exposed; the default trusted_hosts setting blocks the common case but not a route whose host requirement accepts a slash, such as .+.
Not affected if no-host-placeholders, no-path-based-access-control, patched-version
Who cares php, symfony, symfony-routing, web-apps
composer show symfony/routing and compare the version against the fixed ranges.app.{domain} on routes that also rely on path-based access_control or firewall rules.framework.trusted_hosts is set and whether the web server passes the raw Host header through.5.4.56 or laterThe Symfony Routing components CompiledUrlMatcher and UrlMatcher interpret the host and path information differently, allowing path-based authorization rules to be bypassed in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11.
6.4.507.4.23 or later8.1.11 or laterFor routes that define a host, CompiledUrlMatcher matches the string $host.'.'.$pathinfo against the host regular expression followed by the path regular expression, while UrlMatcher matches the host and the path separately. A host placeholder can therefore match /, and consume the beginning of the path, so the request is routed to a controller, while UrlMatcher would find no route. Rules that look at the path, such as access_control entries and firewall patterns, are evaluated against the actual request path, so they do not apply while the controller of the route runs, potentially allowing an unauthenticated request to reach a protected controller. For example, with the route /admin/report/{id}, the host app.{domain} and the rule access_control: [{ path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }], an anonymous request for /admin/report/1 is sent to the login page. A request with the Host header app and path /x./admin/report/1 instead reaches the controller, with domain="/x". With the required domain: .+, the real hostname works: app.example.com and /x./admin/report/1 match with domain="example.com./x".
Applications are affected if they have routes with host placeholders protected by path-based rules. With the default requirement, the Host header must be the host of the route without its last labels, such as app: framework.trusted_hosts blocks that, while a web server that only serves known names may not, for instance, Nginx passing the raw Host header to FastCGI for a request line that carries an absolute URI. If the requirement accepts /, such as .+, a real hostname works, and trusted_hosts does not help.
This page as .md · .json · in your agent: get_signal("CVE-2026-118516") · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
NVD data is provided by NIST and is public domain. Posts quoted belong to their authors.