Live › vulnerability › GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8
Go to dashboardNodemailer's address parser ends an RFC 5322 comment at the first closing parenthesis, so a nested comment makes it read the rest of the address as a different recipient. An attacker who controls an address passed to Nodemailer can redirect mail to an attacker chosen domain even when the application's own validator approved the address.
Summary written from the sources below. Check the originals before acting.
First seen by InfraStack 2026-10-23 21:56 UTC. All times on this page are UTC.
| Product | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodemailer | npm | >= 3.0.0, < 10.1.4 | 10.1.4 |
npm ls nodemailer (affected if 3.0.0 through 10.1.3)10.1.4 or laterEach row is the first time that source carried this signal. The analyst’s rows are its own findings.
RFC 5322 comments nest. addressparser ended a comment at the first ), including the one that closes a nested comment, and parsed the rest of the outer comment as header text. Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]> names [email protected] with x(y) <[email protected]> as a comment, and Nodemailer read it as the address [email protected]. This is the same shape as the escaped parenthesis fixed in 10.1.2, reached through nesting instead of a quoted-pair. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
The attacker controls the text of an address that an application passes to Nodemailer, or the From or To header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.
An application validates a submitted address with a conformant parser and allows only its own domain. The attacker submits Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>, which validates as [email protected]. Nodemailer delivers to [email protected]. In the inbound direction, a DMARC or display layer built on a conformant parser and a mail client built on mailparser disagree on the author of the same message, which is the setting for sender spoofing. The boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list, or the author check of the receiving side.
const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');
console.log(addressparser("Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>"));
// [ { address: '[email protected]', name: 'Victim) [email protected]' } ]
Python's email._header_value_parser.get_address_list reads the same value as [email protected] with the display name Victim, with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.
Mail intended for an approved recipient is delivered to an attacker chosen domain, disclosing its content, and parsers built on this module report a different author than conformant ones. The misreading only occurs on values a conformant validator approves, so correct validation is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.
The fix counts comment depth and ends a comment only at the ) that closes the outermost one.
Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
This page as .md · .json · in your agent: get_signal("GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8")
GitHub Advisory Database, CC-BY 4.0. Posts quoted belong to their authors.