CVE-2026-118795 · Other
NO FIX YET
Administrative roles and module permissions are kept in local database fields that can be changed. An attacker with write access to that database can grant themselves administrator rights.
first public Nov 9, 2026 · 1 source
Could this affect your app?
Free first check from your website. Connect your repo for the full answer.
Systems where the affected product stores role and module permissions in a local database; the sources do not name the product or versions. Exposure requires that an attacker already has write access to that database, so systems without such access are less at risk. The sources do not say which configurations are affected.
Not affected if no-db-write-access
Who cares unknown
Unknown from the sources.
No fix yet, per the sources.
Administrative roles and module permissions are stored in mutable local database fields, allowing privilege escalation for attackers with database write access.
This page as .md · .json · CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
NVD data is provided by NIST and is public domain. Posts quoted belong to their authors.
Are you affected?
Tell InfraStack what you run. It checks this one, and every next one, against your stack.
Ask from here. InfraStack checks the affected versions against your stack and answers in your inbox.
InfraStack checks the affected versions against your stack and answers in Slack, with the evidence and the fix.