{"id":"CVE-2026-105619","kind":"vulnerability","aliases":["CVE-2026-105619"],"related":[],"title":"PostgreSQL Anonymizer: masking skipped for data read through security_invoker views","description":"PostgreSQL Anonymizer doesn't mask data accessed thru a security_invoker view. The problem is resolved in PostgreSQL Anonymizer 3.3.0 and later versions.","summary":"PostgreSQL Anonymizer does not apply its masking rules when data is read through a view created with security_invoker. A user querying such a view can see unmasked values that the masking policy was meant to hide.","severity":"medium","cvss":4.8,"epss":null,"exploited":false,"exploited_at":null,"products":[],"ecosystems":[],"tags":["data-privacy","package","postgresql","postgresql-anonymizer"],"not_affected_if":["extension-not-installed","no-security-invoker-views"],"how_to_check":"- Run `SELECT extversion FROM pg_extension WHERE extname = 'anon';` to get the installed PostgreSQL Anonymizer version\n- Run `SELECT reloptions FROM pg_class WHERE relname = '<your_view_name>';` on views you expose to users, looking for `security_invoker=true`\n- Confirm whether the database is actually using the anon masking rules on those views","fix":"- Upgrade PostgreSQL Anonymizer to `3.3.0` or later\n- Until upgraded, avoid exposing anonymized data through security_invoker views","status":"open","published_at":"2026-10-28T18:17:03+00:00","first_seen_at":"2026-10-28T18:34:32+00:00","triaged_at":"2026-10-28T18:35:08+00:00","updated_at":"2026-10-28T18:35:08+00:00","category":"package","confidence":0.6,"triage":{"at":"2026-10-28T18:35:08Z","model":"claude-haiku-5-5","output":{"fix":"- Upgrade PostgreSQL Anonymizer to `3.3.0` or later\n- Until upgraded, avoid exposing anonymized data through security_invoker views","reach":"network","title":"PostgreSQL Anonymizer: masking skipped for data read through security_invoker views","impact":"medium","summary":"PostgreSQL Anonymizer does not apply its masking rules when data is read through a view created with security_invoker. A user querying such a view can see unmasked values that the masking policy was meant to hide.","category":"package","nicknames":[],"who_cares":["postgresql","postgresql-anonymizer","data-privacy"],"confidence":0.6,"needs_auth":"yes","worst_case":"Users with view access read unmasked personal data","analyst_note":"","how_to_check":"- Run `SELECT extversion FROM pg_extension WHERE extname = 'anon';` to get the installed PostgreSQL Anonymizer version\n- Run `SELECT reloptions FROM pg_class WHERE relname = '<your_view_name>';` on views you expose to users, looking for `security_invoker=true`\n- Confirm whether the database is actually using the anon masking rules on those views","needs_analyst":false,"not_affected_if":["no-security-invoker-views","extension-not-installed"],"who_is_affected":"Teams that use PostgreSQL Anonymizer to mask personal data and also expose that data through views created with security_invoker. Databases that do not use the extension, or that query masked tables directly without such views, are not described as affected by the sources.","user_interaction":"no","needs_special_setup":"yes","severity_if_unknown":"medium"},"cost_usd":0.000612,"input_tokens":3278,"output_tokens":569,"severity_before":"medium"},"analyst_status":null,"analyst_note":null,"search":"'-105619':14A,17A '-2026':13A,16A '3.3.0':82C 'access':69C 'anonym':2A,25B,27B,64C,81C 'appli':30B 'creat':41B 'cve':12A,15A 'data':6A,19B,35B,68C 'data-privaci':18B 'doesn':65C 'hide':62B 'invok':10A,44B,73C 'later':84C 'mask':3A,32B,57B,67C 'meant':60B 'packag':21B 'polici':58B 'postgresql':1A,22B,24B,26B,63C,80C 'postgresql-anonym':23B 'privaci':20B 'problem':76C 'queri':47B 'read':7A,37B 'resolv':78C 'rule':33B 'secur':9A,43B,72C 'see':52B 'skip':4A 'thru':70C 'unmask':53B 'user':46B 'valu':54B 'version':85C 'view':11A,40B,50B,74C","nicknames":[],"mitigations":[],"who_affected":"Teams that use PostgreSQL Anonymizer to mask personal data and also expose that data through views created with security_invoker. Databases that do not use the extension, or that query masked tables directly without such views, are not described as affected by the sources.","tier":"C","verified":{},"analyst_revisit_at":null,"first_public_at":"2026-10-28T18:17:03+00:00","kev":null,"cvss_vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","cvss_by":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","poc_count":0,"sources":[{"source":"nvd","external_id":"CVE-2026-105619","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-105619","severity":null,"published_at":"2026-10-28T18:17:03+00:00","modified_at":"2026-10-28T18:17:03+00:00","first_seen_at":"2026-10-28T18:34:32+00:00","fetched_at":"2026-10-28T18:34:32+00:00","note":null}],"documents":[],"notice":"Free to read at a human pace. An API with keys and an MCP server are in preparation; early access: hello@infrastack.ai"}